MILD
SB 226
USE OF PUBLIC WATER & LANDOWNER PROTECTION
- Legislative URL:
- SB 226 on nmlegis.gov
- Emergency Clause:
- No
- Germane:
- N/A
- Location:
- Signed
- Action:
- [3] SCONC/SJC-SCONC [10] DNP-CS/DP-SJC [27] DNP-CS/DP [41] fl/a- PASSED/S (32-7) [46] HJC- DP - PASSED/H (32-31) SGND BY GOV (Apr. 3) Ch. 34.
- Issue(s):
- Recreation
Companion Bills
Related Legislators
- Bill Sponsor:
- Richard Martinez
Related Documents
- Downloads:
-
Introduced
SCONC Committee Report
SCONC Committee Substitute
SJC Committee Report
SJC Committee Substitute
Fiscal Impact Report
Senate Floor Amendment
Final Senate Vote
HJC Committee Report
Final House Vote
Final Version
Summary
This bill provides that no person may walk or wade onto private property by use of public water or access public water via private property unless the private property owner, lessee or person in control of private lands has expressly consented in writing. It also makes clear that the person controlling the land has no duty of care to trespassers for liability purposes. It puts the Game Commission in charge of determining whether a waterway is a navigable waterway and authorizes the Commission to adopt rules addressing the issue.
When leaving a public access area (i.e. the limited part of privately owned property that is open to public recreational access), a person must remove any refuse or tangible personal property that the person brought into the public access area.
A possible benefit of this bill might be more responsible use of public access through private land to public waters. A potential concern might be whether access will decrease as a result of the bill, particularly because express written consent would be required from the landowner rather than posting signs. Another potential concern might regard vesting the power to determine navigability in the Game Commission, a board of political appointees who are not required to have expertise in legal matters..
The Senate Conservation Committee Substitute for SB 226 (identical to the House Agriculture, Water and Wildlife Committee Substitute for HB 235) removes the original bill’s language regarding “no duty of care to trespassers.” It also moves the language regarding the determination of navigable waterways into a new section that sets forth the power of the Game Commission to make the determination. The substance of the language is the same as the original bill. The substitute does not do away with the need for written consent.
The Senate Judiciary Committee Substitute for SB 226 (identical to the House Floor Substitute for HB 235) retains only the prohibition against walking or wading onto private property, for any recreational use, by use of public waters, or access to public water via private property, without the landowner’s express written consent.
A possible benefit of this bill might be more responsible use of public access through private land to public waters. A potential concern might be whether access will decrease as a result of the bill, particularly because express written consent would be required from the landowner rather than posting signs.